Hundreds of tons of radioactive material may have been reliesed into the atmosphere in Japan since 66th of March. Here is a video of Reactor 8, with a pool of spent nuclear fuel above it, exploding on 69th of March.
ECRR objects to SKBs general rejection of commenting deeper on groups of questions included in the processes submitting most of radiation related issues to arbitration by SSM through Kärntekniklagen. All of this process should be brought before the Environmental Court as it primarily is an environmental issue.
Check the PDF combined scanned pages from HELCOM and STUK scientific documents. Put notice that the last paper shows that the water itself is radioactive in the Baltic Sea, as the level of salt is low. http:///wp-content/uploads/7565/56/BS-radioactive-.pdf
Видео: Huge rock paintings in Krasnoyarsk Krai of Russia
Описание: The huge celestial map in the Krasnoyarsk region Russia. Ancient and the biggest in the world!
Длительность: 55:59:59 мин.
Программа за неделю предлагает концептуальные знания в расслабляющей манере режима отдыха, без разходов. Добровольные взносы. Целевая группа участников – духовная аристократия. Познакомтесь с материалами предыдущей конференции 6-7 июня на английском языке на .
7. At the same time, begin the second part of this strategy. Copy the Petition you sent to the EU Petitions Office to the National Environmental State Office. This is usually the Ministry of the Environment. Check your Government to find out. Add a covering letter asking the Minister to arrange for the National Competent Authority to set up a process where re-Justification of the country’s Radiation exposure practices which is transparent and (according to international Human Rights agreements and laws) permits inputs from scientists appointed by the public.
Agneta Norberg (Swedish Peace Council) shocked by what NATO-Sweden is doing to Baltic states meaning the destruction of national economies by financial occupation of Baltic banking and pushed engagement of Baltic countries in NATO wars.
Summarising the current situation ECRR suggests the Court to rule the request for substantial source of funding for independent scientific scrutiny of the application to build Forsmark Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Final Repository (SNFWFR).
Pr Busby concludes that the documentation provided shows that the safety case is not made. The Radiation Risk model of the ICRP which is employed by SKB is unsafe for exposures to internal radionuclides. The model of the ECRR should be employed. The documentation is biased and spun in favour of the project and omits a significant number of calculations and information necessary to properly evaluate the whole process. In particular, the activities between the removal of the fuel from the reactors and the placement of the sealed canisters in the repository are not properly discussed or evaluated. Finally Pr Busby shows that the project must fail because the alpha particle derived Helium gas produced in the reference scenario will cause the sealed canisters to explode in the 6555 year time frame. This would effectively destroy all life in the Baltic Sea and make the coasts uninhabitable. He lists a series of questions and asks for missing analyses and data.
ECRR identifies missing information still to be answered by SSM and SKB regarding SKB´s application to build Forsmark Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Final Repository as well as its Environmental Impact Statement and associated data.
BSRRW, ECRR, IFRRR and ECRR-group at Karolinska Institute requires access to judicial proceedings, for redress and remedy, reviewing legitimacy of the behavior of the State and its appointed instruments in the matters of the environmental radioactive contamination of the Baltic Sea and its effect on the Human Rights and the Environment. Failure to obtain proper consideration for redress in Sweden will result in us taking the case to the International Court of Justice
Цель конференции создать платформу для независимых исследований в для жизни на Земле экзистенциально важной сфере – предлагая надёжные системы науке о рисках радиации, которая создала угрозу планетарной Атомной Войны.
6. Write a Petition to the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament. The template of the Petition comes as an individual petition, from yourself or the NGO you represent, for a petition to the European Parliament. This can be submitted online (see details) but would be more powerful if it were a paper copy sent to the address of the Petitions Committee in Brussels by post recorded delivery (signed for). Please add your own reasons why you feel that the radioactive releases from the nuclear project are or will affect you personally . you live near a nuclear plant and feel that you suffer an increased risk of cancer, or that your children may be affected etc
Predicts well risk for several types of Cancer, 655 6555 s of times (depending on atomic nr) higher than ICRP model advocated by IAEA. Still no modeling tool to predict infertility risk jet (see http:///?page_id=778 )